Europe has crossed the point of no return when you think about its ethnic structure. The proportion of people from the other continents may not be very high – it might be ten, fifteen percent – but that’s not the point. The point is that, first and foremost, these ten or fifteen percent are very often virile young men who are willing to put up a fight and assert themselves, while the indigenous Europeans are middle-aged or older, very often childless, pacified, and with no other ambition than to have fun and a good relaxing time. Second, the newcomers form their own communities and have effectively appropriated swaths of France, Great Britain, Germany or Sweden, where the indigenous inhabitants are – to put it mildly – not welcome. Third, the arrivals are neither assimilated nor integrated; rather, they are more and more hostile toward the host nations. Fourth, the host nation has a guilt complex that makes it surrender its property and rights to the people from the other continents. In the future, France, Great Britain, Germany or Sweden may still bear the same names, but they are going to be intrinsically different, will be known as France, Great Britain, Germany or Sweden only in name.
Think about the medieval Holy Roman Empire: it was referred to as Roman and yet it had very little to do with ancient Romans apart from the Latin language that was still used in administration, in written form only, and apart from a few legal terms. The Holy Roman Empire was created and run by the Germanic tribes. Hence in historical texts this political entity is often known by its fuller name: the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation.
There is a difference between the change that occurred in the early Middle Ages and the change that is taking place now. In late antiquity and the early Middle Ages the ancient Romans were gradually being replaced by the Germanic tribes who were genetically related to the Romans: they were white, Indo-European. At first glance you could not tell the difference. At present we are facing something other than this: the settlers from outside Europe are entirely different. They are not Indo-Europeans, their languages are a long distance away from the Indo-European languages, their faiths, their customs, their heritage, their biology… all of this is a far cra from what Europe used to be. Present-day actors from France or Germany, the United Kingdom or Sweden can impersonate ancient Romans without having to have their skin whitened. The Asian and especially African ethnic replacements of the indigenous peoples of Great Britain, France, Germany or Sweden physically do not resemble the host nations. In a not too distant future we can imagine the future African or Asian actors trying to impersonate the historical figures from the European past. They will have to make a huge effort to make themselves look like the Europeans. That’s a measure of the immense transformation that we are facing.
Yes, there were many ethnic replacements throughout history, also in Europe. But in Europe, one European ethnic group replaced or displaced or absorbed the other European ethnic group. The difference between the two groups that were on a collision course was reducible to language. All other features – faith, skin colour, general customs or heritage – were the same or almost the some (Catholic-Protestant-Orthodox), which made it easily possible for one ethnic group to dissolve itself in the other, dominant group. Thus, the Germans settling in Silesia, south-western part of the then Polish Kingdom and today’s Poland, made the indigenous Slavs become Germans with ease and without violence. Once the indigenous Slavs had given up on their language and adopted German as their mother tongue, they became Germans for good, and they were indistinguishable from the German Germans. The same was true of the German settlement in medieval Prussia (today’s north-eastern Poland), where the conquered people were over time germanized (while, accidentally, the country’s name of the conquered was adopted by the conquerors as their own name).
The same is true of the Scots, the Welsh and the Irish who – since they were white and Christian and since they had adopted English as their mother tongue – could seamlessly become British. For all practical terms, to the outside world, they were simply English because… they spoke the English language and there was no other way than language of knowing which ethnicity the representatives of the Scottish or Welsh or Irish nations were. Such is not the case with all the Algerians, Nigerians, Somalians, Pakistanis or Indians. Even if they speak English, French, German or Swedish as native speakers they will remain distinct at first glance when it comes to looks, and they will remain distinct when it comes to their faith and customs. The white sections of the British, French, German or Swedish societies will stand out visibly in many respects which will create racial and ethnic tension and will possibly lead to the emergence of a caste society, something we have in India. The caste system in India was precisely the result of the Aryan settlement among the indigenous peoples on the Indian subcontinent. First, the racial – ethnic – religious – cultural gap was too large to be bridged; second, the particular ethnic groups naturally wanted to preserve their identity, their separateness, they naturally wanted to live among their own kind.
That’s what Europe is in for. And what a paradox! Precisely at the time when the European political class desired to design a nationless European society, by their policy of importing millions of aliens the same political class is contributing to creating a Europe that is going to be even more fragmented than ever before in its history. The dream of creating a universal European who is of mixed race, believes in nature and speaks English is doomed to be shattered. India is a prime example, as are very many other regions of the world.
