The leftist worship of blacks is breathtaking. The academic world has been shattered by the news of Jason Arday – supposedly an ingenious black scholar who held a high position at Cambridge University and who is said to be the youngest black man to have ever held this position at a British university. His career was stunning, his autobiography – the stories that he himself told about his own life – were incredible. And yet, the academic world did not raise a brow although the stories bordered on the impossible, on the unfeasible. Let alone his claim that he ran thirty marathons within thirty-five days, including one or more while having a serious injury to his leg. He claimed that he could not speak till the age of eleven, and that he was unable to read and write until he was eighteen. Nonetheless, he miraculously made up for lost time and managed to make a brilliant career. He was successively employed by Durham University, then University of Glasgow, and eventually at Cambridge. His career was developing at lightspeed. Until someone started investigating his scholarly achievements. And it turned out that his works and especially his PhD thesis was heavily plagiarised, was full of grammatic errors, and generally did not meet the criteria that are set for that kind of publication. Of course, as you will have expected by now, the defence of the leftists who have advanced his career was that these were racist-motivated attacks. Fortunately, the investigators – whether scholars or journalists – persisted in unearthing and exposing the works by Jason Arday and they did it to such an effect that it was no longer possible to defend him. Being put under such enormous pressure he decided (or someone decided for him) to resign from his post at Cambridge University. A few days later he was found dead and his death was pronounced to be an act of suicide.
Before Jason Arday there was Simon Mol. A poet, a journalist who also happened to be black, straight from Africa. He, too, knew precisely how to exploit the naivete of the leftist liberals, and how to exploit the faith of the leftist intellectuals. Simon Mol operated in Poland of all the places in the 90s of the previous century. He claimed to have been persecuted in his own country of Cameroon and he claimed to be a champion for human rights, a fighter against – yes! yes! – racism. He was a darling of the leftist circles in Poland. As such he was lavished with awards. Interviews were conducted with him and he was even called Poland’s anti-fascist of the year. Like in the case of Jason Arday, Simon Mol told his own heroic biography. And, like in Jason Arday’s case, he was exposed by inquisitive journalists: the stories that he had spun were fake. He was not persecuted in his country nor was a champion for human rights. What he was good at was to have sex with numerous white women. That in itself would not have passed as a sin in the leftist world, but the point was that that he was infected with HIV, of which was he was fully aware. Nonetheless he had sex with multiple women without applying any protection, so he consciously and deliberately infected them with HIV. Leftist white young educated women were very eager to copulate with him because to the leftist educated young woman’s mind it is a mark of holding high moral ground that you have sex with a black male. Some of them – the more reasonable ones – had second thoughts about having sex with an unknown male, and so they wanted Simon Mol to use any kind of protection, and do you know what happened? Simon Mol would immediately resort to the racist argument.’ You want me to use a condom,’ he was known to say, ‘because you are racist. You wouldn’t demand that from a white male, would you?’ And, of course, a leftist, progressivist, educated, young white woman saw no other way out as to surrender. The white, leftist, educated, progressivist women view having sex with blacks as a point of honour: they prove her high moral anti-racist standards, they love dabbling in virtue signalling.
Simon Mol operated in Poland in the 1990s of the previous century, Jason Arday operated in Great Britain in 2020s. A span of 30 years. And within this span of 30 years there happened multiple cases of the leftist progressivist activists elevating black individuals to academic, literary, cultural or other heights, in their pursuit to prove to the whole world that blacks are noble, intellectually capable, and ingenious. The fact that they cannot make an academic career s only and exclusively due to racism that is widespread among white nations. It is racism and racism alone that holds black males and black females down.
In both cases – the case of Jason Arday, and the case of Simon Mol – the black fraudsters have met with their own death. Simon Mol succumbed to the virus that he had. Jason Arday died by his own hand. What do you think the leftist intellectuals say about such cases? Oh yes, you guessed it right! Those two ingenious males – the scholar and the poet – have been hunted down by racism, like – by the way – many others. We may rest assured that neither Simon Mol in Poland nor Jason Arday in Great Britain were the last cases of such preposterous fraud.
We can observe it in academia across the white man’s world that intellectuals – especially leftist intellectuals – have dislodged the Christian God from the altar and placed there collective black person. It is interesting to look at this phenomenon, it really is! On the one hand this phenomenon might be viewed as a distortion of the Christian charitable attitude to all those who are downtrodden. The egalitarians of the age of the Enlightenment, the leftist intellectuals of the age of socialism, and present-day intellectuals – usually atheists or agnostics themselves – have internalised this attitude and reoriented it towards blacks who are supposedly downtrodden… by whites, of course. It is a new faith of the white intellectualist. Why do we call this faith? Because this antiracism does not admit of any evidence, does not admit of any common sense. Anything having to do with people of African descent is viewed as sacrosanct. Look, it has been noticed that Jason Arday’s PhD was full of common language mistakes and still no supervisor of his work pointed them out. Why? The question arises whether anybody read Jason Arday’s work. Probably not. Why should they? If they had noticed that the work did not meet academic standards, they would have had to block Jason Arday’s career by not approving his PhD thesis. But that, of course, would have meant that they would have exposed themselves as racists. And being racist is nowadays equivalent to being a heretic whose right place is to be burnt at the stake. Nowadays not of course in the literal sense of the word. Individuals who dare notice that black people do not satisfy the standards set for the white people are branded racist and that means that they are ostracised socially, that their career is brought to a halt, that they are treated like pariahs. That’s the present day equivalent of the mediaeval burning at the stake.
Jason Arday’s PhD thesis was worthless, just like the so-called poetry composed by Simon Mol. You might want to read some of his pieces and enjoy them to the full. But then in the present-day world where poetry means haphazardly putting together words and phrases that do not rhyme or make sense – anything goes. After all, there is no objectivity. What is accepted as a literary achievement is whatever the intellectual elites say so.
When you think about Jason Arday and Simon Mol, you stop wondering that the black woman has been cast in the role of Helen of Troy in Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey. The film’s director – just like his scholarly and political colleagues – desperately wants to virtue-signal, he, too, desperately wants to show how strongly he clings to the new faith of venerating black people. Merit doesn’t matter – skin colour does. We keep reminding the reader again and again that a similar system was once in operation in socialist countries, where merit didn’t matter either, but someone’s social position. If you had a working class background then you qualified for the highest positions either in government or administration or academia or the military. That’s how religion operates. You are qualified because you are descended from the lower classes or other races.
It would be interesting to ask a psychologist or – even better – a psychiatrist why educated people, people who otherwise apply the scientific method, all of a sudden become religious, or even superstitious when it comes to human races. Yes, they are superstitious, not even religious because reasonable religious people do not let themselves commit such preposterous blunders. Think about Thomas Aquinas or Saint Augustine. They tried to ground religion in reason, they attempted to place religion on the foundations of reasoning,. They may have erred here and there, but at least they tried to make sense of the religious stuff. Now consider present day scholars and scientists who want to elevate black people in academia, and administration, and government. They do not even bother to select such black people as to convince the rest of us that those selected blacks are qualified. Or, if they really cannot find a suitable black person for a position in academia or government, they should at least do something to make him or her look like a competent person. In the case of Jason Arday they should have written his PhD for him. In the case of Jason Arday and Simon Mol they should have checked the stories that those guys had spun about themselves. In both cases – even if they so desperately wanted to elevate those two males – the intellectualists should have at least doctored those stories – they should have tried to make them plausible. Why didn’t they do it, why did they swallow their autobiographies hook, line and sinker?
What has happened to the intellectuals in the white man’s world? You can understand that certain empathetic individuals want to elevate blacks – and people of colour generally – along the social ladder. If it is true that they are held back simply because of their skin colour, then of course the attempts aiming at elevating such people are warranted. Just like it was in the case of those socialist countries that we’ve mentioned above. Sure enough, among the peasantry and among the working class there have always been born talented individuals, and such talented individuals are going to always be born among the people of lower social classes. Such talented individuals need to be supported and elevated, not only because it is an act of empathy, not only because this is an act of rendering social justice, but also because once such talented individuals start doing science or creating art or participating in government – all members of society will benefit from their activity. Similarly, if intellectuals want to elevate people of colour, there’s basically nothing wrong about that. What is wrong about that attitude is that they do not want to support and advance talent. What is wrong about that is that they want to support and advance skin colour. That idea is preposterous!
It is not that we do not approve of elevating talented black people. As said above, a talented person benefits the whole of society. It is that we disapprove of the practice of elevating people on the basis of their skin colour. That’s pure racism.
Consider the following. The intellectuals feel compelled to elevate the likes of Jason Arday or Simon Mol, which means that they could not find anybody better than them! Of the many millions of black people that already inhabit Europe leftist intellectuals cannot find even very few that are competent enough to meet the accepted academic, social, scientific, or cultural standards. Do you see the gravity of this question? If among the millions of black males that have become inhabitants of Western Europe you cannot find a handful of competent individuals, then the inference that you can draw is very much sobering: is there nothing to choose from?
What is even worst in all of this is that those leftist intellectuals have not only harmed the esteem of academia and the image of black people collectively, but they have also harmed individual blacks, in our case Jason Arday and Simon Mol. Jason Arday would not have committed suicide if he had not been exposed as a fraudster, and he would not have been exposed as a fraudster had the white intellectuals not turned a blind eye to his fraudulent achievements. he would have lived his own life and could have been as happy as any average person.
In the case of Simon Mol it was the young ingenuous – though educated – women who fell victim to the so-called poet, champion of human rights, and the antifascist of the year. Those young virtue-signalling women would not have contracted HIV if Simon Mol had not been recognised as a poet and fighter for human rights, had he not been presented to the progressivist circles as a monumental figure worthy of veneration. Very few if any of those young educated women would have fallen prey to his predatory machinations if only because they wouldn’t have known about this existence.
Do you think that those leftist intellectuals will correct their ways? Not by any means. You may rest assured that another Jason Arday and another Simon Mol will emerge in the days to come to precisely the same effect. Again and again we will learn about a new talented black male. And again will have them exposed as fraudsters. Again broad circles of white intellectuals will embrace the new manifestation of antiracist religion. Again the leftist priests and (especially) priestesses of antiracism will demand that you venerate people because of the blackness of their skin.
We very often laugh at the people of the Middle Ages that they were so backward in their attitudes and beliefs. It is highly likely that our backwardness is far larger. After all, the people in the Middle Ages did not have at their disposal the achievements of modern science that we have, after all we should be wiser by the mere passage of ten or so centuries that separate us from the Middle Ages. As it is, we turn out to be perfect fools, we turn out to be as easy to fool as they used to be. They used to believe in the positive or negative impact of the configuration of stars, in magic, in witches or in the flatness of the earth; we are used to believing in the equality of all people. The people in the Middle Ages had their heretics, and we, too, have heretics who today go by the name of racists. Who were the mediaeval heretics? Those were the individuals who using the Bible and following the Bible pointed up either inconsistencies in the text, or accused the Church of not abiding by the precepts laid down in the Bible. Who are present day heretics? These are the so-called racists – individuals who on the basis of facts point to the difference between races and expose the fraudulent practises of the leftist individuals. Oh yes, there is a certain difference. As we mentioned, a heretic in the Middle Ages risked being burnt at the stake, while a racist in the modern era risks being turned into a pariah, professionally and socially. But who knows? Burning at the stake may be reactivated one of these days. You can never know. It’s just like with the capital punishment. Throughout recent history the capital punishment has alternatively been suspended, abolished, and introduced to again be suspended, abolished, and introduced, to again…
One feels helpless hearing such stories as those about Jason Arday or Simon Mol again and again. One knows that those stories will constantly be repeated. This veneration of the colour of skin is a collective psychological or – even better – psychiatric phenomenon. It will come to an end one of these days – maybe in ten years’ time, maybe in fifty years’ time, but it will come to an end, and that’s the only consolation. This craziness will end because all intellectual constructs that go counter to reality are doomed right from the start. Inevitably.
Meanwhile, willy-nilly, we are doomed to look forward to the emergence of another cultural or academic super-nova like Jason Arday or Simon Mol, another scholar or poet before whom we will be expected to piously genuflect.
