Europe

For the wages of sin is death

Eighty six years ago today the Second World War broke out. It broke out on September 1, 1939, with Germany assailing Poland, and with Great Britain and France declaring war on the Third Reich three days later. Within the next more than five years Europe would be engulfed in flames, suffer enormous devastation and a huge loss of life. What was the cause of the war? No, we are not going to repeat the hackneyed arguments that our readers are most likely to be familiar with, to be familiar with all of them. We are going to point to one thing only: intemperance.

Yes, intemperance. Intemperance in the political appetite of the main player, of Germany. Had Adolf Hitler stopped his aggressive policy after gobbling up Czechia, Germany would most probably have become the most powerful country in Europe, the German language would be what the English language is today. Taking into account the advancements of German technology during the late thirties and early forties – the television being launched during the Berlin Olympic Games in 1936, the jet engine (Me-262) and the V-2 missiles – Germany most probably would have launched the first man into orbit and land him on the moon. The entirety of Europe – maybe only except for the United Kingdom and partly France – was under German influence and… spell. Think of Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, think of the national-socialist parties in Norway, and even Great Britain, think of the expansion of German cinema and what not.

Between the swallowing of Czechia and the offensive against Poland, Germany occupied a huge chunk of territory in central Europe, numbered eighty million people (the United Kingdom had 48, France 41 million inhabitants) and was closely allied during the period of 1939-1944 in one form or another with Italy, Spain, Hungary, Romania, Finland, and Slovakia. There were strong pro-German political movements in Yugoslavia (especially Croats) and Bulgaria as well as in Turkey. No one on the continent pose any threat to Germany, either militarily or economically. There were numerous German minorities in Poland and Romania, which could be leveraged against the Polish or Romanian authorities. Germany regained its position as a power and appeared to be mightier than it had been before the First World War. The only thing that Germany seemed to have lost for good were the few African colonies that it had had prior to the outbreak of the First World War. Anyway, had Berlin stopped at this point – 1938/1939 – its expansionary politics, had Adolf Hitler died or been toppled… Had Germany shown restraint…

As we know, pride – or better put: self-pride – comes before a fall. Intemperance in its political appetites brought Germany to rack and ruin within a couple of years. The country lost a third of its territory, was split into two political entities, has been and remains in a way occupied till this day, while the German language, culture, literature and cinema have lost to the English language and American culture, literature or cinema.

Isn’t it the same with the European Union nowadays? It began modestly as an economic union of six states coming together only for the purpose of jointly managing the extraction and production of coal and steel. Then the union began expanding, gobbling up ever more states, creating ever more administrative structures and imposing its moral rules upon almost the rest of the world. Much the same can be said about NATO. Initially, a reasonable defensive organization, has evolved into a truncheon, a bludgeon with which the West decided to discipline or police small, powerless countries, be it Yugoslavia or Libya. Both organizations began swelling, swelling rapidly and could not recognize any limits to their growth. They did not even – which would be rational – allow themselves time to digest what had recently been swallowed. Hence, the unstoppable expansion to the east. Isn’t this expansion comparable the that of Germany’s before 1939? Both Berlin then and Brussels now are just incapable of recognizing limits to their growth (though otherwise they claim that there are such limits in economy, see the notorious tenet worked out by the Club of Rome). As a result, the European Union and NATO, just as the Third Reich, have been keeping expanding, come hell or high water, reeling in more and more territory and people. Is it so because it is Germany that is at the core of the European Union?

Eventually, just as the Third Reich found its nemesis and its undoing in Russia, so, too, does the European Union and NATO. It was in Russian and Ukrainian (Ukrainian!) steppes that the German (and Italian, an Hungarian, and Romanian) armies dug their graves. It is again in Russia and Ukraine that the European Union and NATO are digging their own graves. Eighty years later. Had Brussels and Washington stopped on the River Bug (the river separating Poland from Belarus), the European Union would by now have become a political and economic colossus that China and Russia would have reckoned with. As it is, it appears that the Union is at the end its economic and political tether, while China is on the rise.

It is not without reason that intemperance is one of the seven deadly sins: it brings a downfall. Restraint is a virtue: its reward is prosperity and stability.

Notice that just as Berlin could not recognize its failure in the east and continued war to the bitter end, so does the European Union. Are the bureaucrats in Brussels hoping for a miracle as Adolf Hitler did? The Miracle of the House of Brandenburg? Well, such miracles do happen, but miracles are miracles precisely because they happen extremely rarely. Yes, it happened so during the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763), when Berlin was captured by the Russian troops and Prussia was on its deathbed, that an unexpected change on the Russian throne caused Russia to suddenly withdraw its troops from Prussia, thus weakening the anti-Prussian alliance (made up among others of Austria and France), thus saving Frederick II, who then famously coined the quoted phrase of the Miracle of the House of Brandenburg. Yes, it was kind of a miracle. And, since it was a miracle, it happened but once. Else it wouldn’t be known in history as a miracle. Now, Hitler hoped for the same or similar event, sitting in his Berlin bunker and staring at the image of his beloved historical hero: Frederick the Great. Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s death close to the end of the Second World War began to be construed by Hitler’s entourage as a miraculous sign. They had hoped for a political change, the end of the coalition between the United States, the United Kingdom and the Soviet Union, the resultant salvation of the Third Reich – a repeat of the Miracle of the House of Brandenburg. But no, the miracle did not repeat itself because miracles are rare, extremely rare.

Also today we can observe the coalition of the willing, top European leaders who intransigently refuse to look reality in the face. They are hoping for a collapse of Vladimir Putin, for societal unrest inside Russia and for a successful offensive on the part of the Ukrainians. The leaders who are making up the coalition of the willing are not as yet hidden in a bunker and they are not staring at the portrait of Frederick the Great, but they behave precisely like they are hidden in a bunker and staring at the Prussian king’s image. Teenagers and elderly people are drafted into the Ukrainian army just as teenagers and the elderly were drafted into the Volkssturm, and despite the obvious and glaring similarity the leaders making up the coalition of the willing seem to be totally oblivious to it. What are they counting on? On the miracle of the House of Brussels?

The EU leaders and creators have had an opportunity to create something valuable in history and they have botched everything up. That’s because they were and continue to be puffed up with self-pride and intemperance. It was not enough to unite Europe and somehow mix European nations: they needed to let in the Third Worlders by the million; it was not enough to just respect the cultural differences and especially to respect the moral mainstay of the Old Continent: they needed to flood it with the rainbow propaganda; it was not enough to enjoy a modest, rational economic development: they needed to jump into the “green” “sustainable” and “renewable” never-never world. Lastly, it was not enough to keep within the European fold almost all European countries and to slowly solidify the union and NATO: they needed to expand without rhyme or reason and they desperately needed to tease and irk big Russia.

Fools. Fools like insatiable Napoleon Bonaparte, fools like intemperate Adolf Hitler. They wanted more and more, deeper and deeper, farther and farther, faster and faster till they hit with their heads against a brick wall and now are forced to retreat with their tails between their legs. Fools. They thought they were all-powerful, like gods. They thought the world was out there for them to shape and form to suit their whims and their narcissistic grandiosity. They sacrificed the lives of the millions and still have absolutely no pangs of conscience. Yet, just as their political predecessors, they are eventually being punished. The union is coming apart at the seams. It is in a downward spiral – economically, demographically and politically. Think of the seven dwarfs – top European politicians – taking orders from President Donald Trump in the White House. Think of them being asked to leave the room because the real leader wanted to phone another real leader, that is the hated Putin. It was not very much earlier when the seven dwarfs framed themselves as the seven giants, giants that can confidently dictate to Russia, China and India. Look at them now with their silly, ridiculous seventeenth-eighteenth-nineteenth package of sanctions. Look at them conspiring among themselves while Trump and Putin – the real leaders – confer above their heads. The seven dwarfs could have been leading their union to a “bright” future, but they preferred to listen to the serpent hanging from a tree. The serpent told them that they could do whatever they pleased. They listened and believed. And they became intemperate. Intemperance is a sin, and – as we know (though they don’t) – the wages of sin is death.

US earns, EU pays, Ukraine dies

It’s that simple. Lindsey Graham, the senator, explained it in a few sentences. Americans will produce the weaponry, Europeans will finance the production, while Ukrainians will receive them. That’s what he said. He only omitted to add that Ukrainians would receive the weaponry in order to die. What else? No one in his right mind thinks they can win.

Is that the re-industrialization of the United States? Manufacture of military items alone is not exactly what makes for a healthy economy. For the United States to be an economic superpower, it needs to produce competitive automobiles, digital devices and all the rest that makes the world develop and prosper. More to it: the United States needs not only to produce such items, but also to outproduce China, and Taiwan.

Is that the benefit that the European Union gets from being allied with the United States? Paying for American military equipment will inject money into American economy, but how does that relate to Europe’s economy? With no cheap oil or gas, the EU is going to have a hard time.

Is that a real aid that Ukraine needs? Unlikely. Russia has gained the upper hand and its military strength is on the rise. Ukraine is on its last legs while its soldiers are alleged to be deserting the ranks in droves. Why then bleed the nation?

When Napoleon was defeated at the 1813 Battle of Leipzig, he was compelled to retreat to France. The allied forces – Russia, Prussia, Austria, England – were not quite sure whether they could eventually beat the Emperor, so they offered him a peace settlement which stipulated that France would retain the territories up to the Rhine River and some chunks of northern Italy, i.e. an area that France’s King Louis XIV (the Sun King!) wanted to control, but eventually could not because he did not manage to prevail over France’s enemies. What did Napoleon do? Yes, you know it very well. He defied the allies and continued the war effort. France, like today’s Ukraine, was exhausted by war but never mind! You can always count on a miracle. The result was that France lost and was reduced to the pre-war area, while Napoleon was made to resign from his throne, which was much to the joy of the common French people who by that time had had enough of his wars. What do you think Ukrainians dream of now? Of prolonging war? Of having Mr Zelensky on the throne? Give me a break!

Americans are running low on the stock of arms, the EU is running out of sanctions, while Ukraine is running out of manpower. President Donald Trump has threatened all the countries around to world to impose 100% tariffs on them if they continue trading with Russia. Well, if countries trade with Russia it means that they profit from it. Many of them have purchased American treasuries. In other words, they are American creditors. Will the American president punish American creditors? That would be another bad signal to all the world, another bad signal after the West’s freezing Russian financial assets back in 2022. Given such a development of events, how can particular nations trust the dollar as a safe store of value, and SWIFT as s safe system of financial exchange?

Are we not in a death spiral downwards? Are these measures not like reckless body movements of one drowning in a swamp? What an irony, especially when you think of someone wanting to dry up the swamp…

Gefira 93: A big picture of purpose

When it comes to the war in Ukraine, Europe – the European Union along with the United Kingdom – is in a fight mode while the United States is not. Europe is still flaunting its so-called human and democratic values, while the United States has just reversed the course of wokeism and genderism. European leaders have shut themselves off from the outside world in their echo chambers and surround themselves with like-minded bellicose individuals, while the United States is trying to find a balance in its foreign policy. Europe is still objectifying Ukraine – the country and the nation are only viewed as a battering ram against Russia, Europe’s topmost foe, while the new American administration seems to be red-pilled to for-ever wars and has become to deal with reality on the ground as it is. European and American ways have ceased to align.

Europe has a history of aggressiveness directed towards the east, which was encapsulated by the notorious German political catchphrase Drang nach Osten or Drive to the East. Indeed, wars between the western and eastern parts of the Old Continent were invariably initiated by its western part. These were the military raids of the Teutonic Knights, these were the invasions launched by Sweden or France, by imperial Germany and the Third Reich. For all that historical record, it is Russia that is credited with aggressive intentions. Why, Europeans, including those with university degrees, are not familiar even cursorily with their own past. Schools are not there for the Europeans to let knowledge sink in; schools are for mind shaping.

Europe obsessed with Russia and Putin appears to be overlooking the worldly political and economic trends. The developing countries are slowly but steadfastly gaining economic and – what follows – political momentum. The United States has broken with globalism and is focusing on its own affairs, recognizing that its role as a global hegemon has come to an end. Not that Washington has given up on exerting leverage here and there in the world: the action to control the Panama Canal or the plans of taking control over Greenland show that the American empire is alive and kicking. Yet, the United States needs to reckon with powerful rivals and concede them some political room on the world stage. It is not only Russia, it is China as well.

Europe has let itself be pushed out of Africa, Europe has developed a guilt complex towards Africans for all the failures of the latter and Europe embarked upon letting itself be colonized. The vacuum created on the Dark Continent has attracted the attention of the Middle Kingdom. China is taking Africa over from degenerating Europe. China’s population is numerically almost a perfect match to that of Africa, while Europe’s dwindling indigenous population is on a slippery road to nothingness. While European influence in Africa is often denounced in European capitals as neo-colonialism, China’s take on its presence on the Dark Continent is framed by Beijing as Going Global. Europe, riddled with guilt and shame, cannot stand up to the Middle Kingdom with the latter’s political ambition. Europe has become irrelevant, while China is a rising star. Also on the Dark Continent.

 

Gefira Financial Bulletin #93 is available now

  • Russia – a stumbling block of nations
  • Greenland
  • Europe out, China in
  • The Mar-a-Lago plan

The EU under “Führer Ursula” is not a peaceful project, says Lavrov

A few days ago, this week, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov gave an interview to three Americans: Judge Napolitano, Larry Johnson, and Mario Nawfal. Judge Napolitano runs a popular YouTube channel Judging Freedom, Larry Johnson is a former CIA operative, while Mario Nawfal runs his own channel on YouTube. A few days prior to the Lavrov interview, the last of the three mentioned interviewed Belarus’ President Alexandr Lukashenko. The interview with Minister Lavrov lasted an hour and a half and was conducted in English without an interpreter.

Go and have a listen before it is not taken down by YouTube. If you think you can form your own judgement, you need to know what the other side to the conflict has to say. Especially from the horse’s mouth, so much so that Minister Lavrov did 95% of the talking. Below a few take-aways from the interview.

① Russia is a Christian country, a Christian nation with Christian values. The United States and Western Europe have departed from Christianity and have been pursuing deviant ideas of the alphabet sexuality, unisex toilets and the like.

② The West promised Mikhail Gorbachev not to expand NATO eastwards by an inch and broke its promise. Even if it were not formulated in written form (it was), a man of honour keeps his word.

③ Security cannot be divisible, i.e. one country cannot provide for its security at the expense of another country. Expanding NATO may increase the West’s security, but it certainly decreases the security of the Russian Federation.

④ Ukraine itself is to blame for the losses that it has sustained. Had there be no coup d’etat as a result of which legitimate President Viktor Yanukovych was made to flee the country, Ukraine would not have lost Crimea; had Kiev abided by the Minsk I and Minsk II Accords, Ukraine would not have lost the four eastern provinces.

⑤ Viktor Yanukovych, Ukraine’s president who was toppled by the coup in 2014, had every right to reconsider Ukraine’s association with the European Union. There was no malice on his part, nor was he a Russophile. The decision of associating Ukraine with the European Union had very serious economic consequences. At that time there were no tariffs between Ukraine and Russia, but there were tariffs between Ukraine and the European Union. An association with the European Union meant lifting the tariffs between the EU and Ukraine, which would have meant the necessity of imposing such tariffs between Ukraine and the Russian Federation as the Russian Federation needed to protect its market against European products. Since Ukraine’s trade with Russia was way larger than that with the EU, an association with the EU would have meant huge economic losses for the country.

⑥ The European Union is not a peaceful project. Minister Lavrov quoted Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen who said that “peace in Ukraine could actually be more dangerous than the war that is currently taking place,” and quoted Jens Stoltenberg, NATO’s secretary general, who floated an idea of expanding the alliance or the alliance’s tentacles as far east as China, Korea and the Pacific Ocean. One of the most bellicose politicians of the European Union is its leader Führer Ursula, as Lavrov put it, and mentioned the 800 billion earmarked by her for the re-militarization of the continent.

⑦ All the anti-Russian campaigns like those centered around the downing of the Malaysian airliner, the Skripal and the Navalny cases, the Bucha massacre allegedly perpetrated by Russians were aimed at harming the international image of the Russian Federation. This is easy to prove because in each of the aforementioned cases Russia’s request to have access to the medical, chemical, legal and other documentation was denied.

⑧ Human rights have been weaponized by the West. Human rights only serve as a pretext to meddle with the internal affairs of other nations and as a justification for assaulting them militarily.

That’s Minister Lavrov’s understanding of the ongoing conflict between the West and the Russian Federation, that’s in a nutshell Russia’s view of the current political situation and its causes.

Who’s Next or What’s Next?

An avalanche of events within a couple of days. [1] an attempt that resembled a Kiev-like coup d’état in Tbilisi, Georgia; [2] the results of the presidential election in Romania recognized as invalid; [3] Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad toppled. What’s coming next?

The unrest in Tbilisi, Georgia, has been compounded by Ukraine and the Baltic States, which imposed sanctions on Georgia! Yes, Ukraine, which is supposedly struggling hard for survival, and the three teeny-weeny Baltic States imposed sanction on Georgia, on the ruling Georgian Georgian Dream party, which won the parliamentary election. The Maidan in Tbilisi or the colour revolution – whichever name we assign to the event – is being played out just as it was played out in Belgrade or Kiev or Minsk or, or, or. The West’s Red Guards* – especially the youth – have taken to the streets, using all the tricks that have already been utilized in other places, at other times. European Union flags (the fingerprints of the powers behind) are waved, women approach the police troops with flowers, children participate, interviews are conducted on the spot during which people shed tears to show how oppressed they have been, posters are shown to the cameras with legend demanding the resignation of the current government and complaining about violence, lack of democracy, and lack of human rights. Everything is copied from other places, from other times.

The presidential election in Romania has been annulled by Romania’s supreme court – although a day earlier the same court announced the validity of the voting process and voting results – because voters might have been misled by misinformation about the candidates provided to them by… TikTok. No need to add that the results have been annulled for this simple reason that it was Calin Georgescu who won the majority of votes, and Calin Georgescu appears to be a Romanian Viktor Orbán, which is precisely something that the European Union cannot come to terms with. Brussels has enough trouble with the Hungarian Orbán, and Slovakia’s Robert Fico. The annulment and the resultant repeat of the election is something that the European Union is used to applying. This practice first began with referendums held in particular countries about their accession to the European Moloch. If a referendum revealed that the majority of the voters were against having their country joined to the EU, the referendum was repeated, until the desired result was obtained. Romanians must understand that they need to elect an EU-backed candidate or else they will prove that they do not know what democracy is all about and will be forced to elect again, and again, and again.

The intensification of the civil war in Syria has within the last two weeks gained momentum and eventually brought about the collapse of President Bashar al-Assad, habitually referred to by the Western media as a dictator. The president is rumoured to have fled to Russia. Damascus, Syria’s capital, has been taken over by Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, which, depending on your political stance, may be categorized as a rebel, terrorist or opposition organization. The West has eventually hunted Bashar al-Assad down, a target that has been pursued for years. Israeli troops are also reported to have entered southern Syria. Was the collapse of the Bashar al-Assad government occasioned by the fact that its major supporter – Russia – has been engaged in Ukraine? Or maybe the United States has struck a secret deal with Russia according to which Moscow will give up on Syria, while Washington will give up on Ukraine?

Meanwhile the cooperation between Moscow and Minsk is tightening to the effect that the famed Oreshnik** missile launch-pads will be deployed to Belarus.

All of which suggests the following development of events:

[1] Syria is likely to become another Libya or another Iraq in that it is going to face a long period of disability marked by warring factions and a lack of a central government. The country might be occupied partly by Turkey, partly by Israel.

[2] Iran may be next on the kill list. That’s the last state in the Middle East that is regarded by Israel – and hence by the United States – as an enemy.

[3] The next Maidan will be attempted in Minsk, Belarus, because Alexandr Lukashenko, Belorussian president, is again a candidate in the presidential election that is scheduled for January 26, 2025. Minsk has already survived such a Maidan, so the Belorussian authorities will be well prepared to crush another one.

[4] Any possible elections in Hungary may be declared null and void if Viktor Orbán wins again, failing which the Hungarian prime minister may as well reckon with an assassination (see the Robert Fico case in Slovakia).

[5] The European Union is evidently turning into an aggressive and dictatorial political bloc that will tolerate no swerving from the course charted in Brussels. Disobedient governments will experience Maidans, or have their elections annulled, or face sanctions, or have their leaders assassinated. Taking into account that it is Germany that leads the European Union, one might say that a Fourth Reich is in the making.

[6] Belarus and Georgia, two countries that have historically been either part of Russia (Belarus), or united with Russia by means of a political union (Georgia), in the face of all the political pressure, economic sanctions and enormous interference from the West, might be pushed into Moscow’s embrace. The same conclusion might be drawn by the other Caucasian states as well as the states of Central Asia. They all might be pushed into Moscow’s embrace . The resultant union might be like that between Russia and Belarus. In other words the Russian Empire is about to be re-created (certainly not the Soviet Union, as this possible political structure is not going to indulge in communist ideas).

Who knows? It might be that in a few years’ time history will turn full circle with the re-birth of the Russian Empire. A rump Ukraine will probably become a buffer-zone state, as Moscow may not be willing to incorporate Ukraine’s westernmost regions inhabited by rabidly anti-Russian Ukrainians, and the West will not be strong enough to draw this westernmost part into its sphere of interests.

————–

*Red Guards – these were the shock troops, made up of predominantly of young people, who – as the Communist Party’s battering ram – carried out the Cultural Revolution in Maoist China, suppressing opposition from conservative and prudent sections of Chinese society.

**Oreshnik – that hypersonic missile that recently hit Yuzhmash, a military plant in Ukraine. Though it was not fitted with either a nuclear or any other explosive device, the damage it caused is comparable to that caused by an A-bomb.

Georgia – repeat of Ukraine

These days there are street riots being held in Tbilisi, Georgia’s capital city. Why? Well, because the ruling Dream Party has announced a delay in joining Georgia to the European Union (does it not remind you of something?), and while Georgia’s president – Salome Zourabichvili – has opposed the ruling party and called on the citizens to protest. The protests are supported by the West – the United States and the European Union – which claims that the recent parliamentary election were fraudulent. Georgia, according to the West, ought to hold new elections till Georgians elect the pro-Western parties. Sorry, till Georgians restore democracy and human rights.

Who is Georgia’s President Salome Zourabichvili, the woman who encourages protests against Georgia’s government and parliamentary majority? For all practical purposes she is French: she was born in France, educated in France, held French citizenship and made a career in the French diplomatic corps, acting among others as French ambassador to… Georgia. Ah yes, she was born to Georgian parents, but that’s about everything that makes her Georgian. Also Zbigniew Brzeziński was born to Polish parents, yet he identified as an American. By the way, during her educational career Salome Zourabichvili attended Columbia University, where she studied under the tutelage of… yes, Zbigniew Brzeziński. That’s how much Georgian Salome Zourabichvili is. But back to the street riots.

It somehow happens so that whenever a nation elects parties, prime ministers, presidents or heads of state that are even slightly not pro-Western, such a nation immediately has a revolution on its hands and is immediately beset with accusations of running foul of democracy and violating human rights. At present, that’s the fate of Georgia. More to it. A nation that is sceptical towards the West is automatically accused of acting on Russia’s advice, Russia’s orders, for Russia’s money. At present, that’s precisely what the Georgian Dream Party is accused of. It’s all as simple as that.

Now, the street riots in Tbilisi are comparable to the street riots that took place in Kiev in 2013/2014. Precisely the same forces were at play in Ukraine’s capital as are now in Georgia’s capital. Young, impressionable people yell their demand to join Georgia to the European Union – because, as we all know, there is no salvation outside the European Union – while the police are trying to keep the rioters under control, which they fail, as did their counterparts in Kiev ten years earlier, because their orders are to handle the rioters with kid gloves (such were also the orders that the Ukrainian police took ten years earlier). Soon, if not already, the rioters will start jumping and chanting “Who’s not jumping is a Moskal*(=Russian)!” as their Ukrainian counterparts did in 2013/2014 in Kiev. Because – you did expect it, didn’t you? – the delay that their ruling party announced in joining Georgia to the European Union was dictated by – yes! yes! – Russia. How otherwise? Just as it was in 2013 in the case of Ukraine! Again this Russian serpent suggesting a poisonous apple this time to Georgians who are on the threshold of entering the Garden of Eden known as the European Union. And – who knows? – on the threshold of joining peaceful-loving, defensive NATO. The ongoing war in Ukraine and the hundreds of thousands of victims do not seem to make an impression on Georgian protesters. Evidently, they also want to sit in the trenches, to have their arms and legs torn away by bombs and grenades, to have their cities shelled, to have their cemeteries filled to overflowing with corpses of very young men, draped with Georgian national flags. No price is too high for preserving democracy and human rights, is it?

Before Salome Zourabichvili as president, Georgia had one Mikheil Saakashvili as its head of state. Do you remember him? An adventurer that very few could rival. He took power in Georgia by means of… street riots and one of the many colour revolutions, accusing the acting government of… fraudulent elections. The same script is enacted again and again around the globe, and nobody seems to take notice. As president, Mikheil Saakashvili applied a shock therapy to the nation, purging the police and the administration, raising the military budget, yet lowering social expenditure and what not. He soon ran foul of his nation and prior to the next presidential election, with no hope of being reelected, he fled the country amid accusations of having opposition activists tortured. He landed a job in… Ukraine, of all the places, becoming governor of the Odessa region. And you know what? He wholeheartedly supported the Kiev Maidan of 2013/2014!

It did not last long till Ukraine’s president Petro Poroshenko – surely out of gratitude for his services – deprived him of Ukrainian citizenship. To be the governor of the Odessa region Mikheil Saakashvili needed to acquire Ukrainian citizenship, just as Salome Zourabichvili needed to renounce her French citizenship prior to running for president in Georgia. Such a formality. How often and how easily the pawns at the hands of the managers of the world change their citizenship! How often they hold citizenship of two or three countries simultaneously! But then, that’s probably one of those sacrosanct “hyooman rytes”. Such individuals, those who are our and presidents, renounce or accept citizenship the way you and me change clothes from casual to professional to casual, as the circumstances dictate.

You won’t really be surprised if you learn that – I quote Wikipedia – Mikheil Saakashvili “received an LL.M. from Columbia Law School […] took classes at the School of International and Public Affairs and the George Washington University Law School [and] received a diploma from the [talk of the wolf!] International Institute of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France.” What a talented guy!

We have such talented men and women across Europe and across the world. They have necessarily been raised by the powers that be at Western universities or institutes, where they have been trained in – why – democracy and human rights!

It appears Georgia – just like any country – must have rulers with the Western blessing or else. Or else, Georgia will have unruly youth in Tbilisi’s centre chanting “Кто не скачет, тот москаль!” [He who is not jumping is a Moskal(=Russian)!]. This chanting and this jumping is repeated again and again and again in various cities across the world and… nobody seems to take notice of this pattern. Strange – or perhaps admirable – how the West manages to always have crowds of people in the streets of various capital cities at the West’s beckoning. In Moscow, in Tbilisi, in Kiev, in Minsk, in Warsaw, in Budapest, in Belgrade, in the Arabic states and about anywhere in the world.

The young men are protesting today to have their limbs cut off tomorrow. They are rioting today to have their dead bodies wrapped in Georgian national flags tomorrow. They are following the bidding of the managers of the world today to be slaughtered like lambs tomorrow. They could watch Ukraine and learn from Ukraine’s fate, but learn they will not. When push comes to shove, Salome Zourabichvili will travel the world over in search of support – the way Zelensky has been doing so for the past three years – to eventually find a sanctuary in her native France or elsewhere in the West. When push comes to shove, Georgian youth will desperately pay through the nose to illegally leave the country and thus avoid conscription. Only the lucky will be able to leave, though. The majority will be drafted and will pay the price the way their Ukrainian peers have been paying the price for the last three years. The Georgian youth could learn from the fate of Ukraine but learn they will not. Sadly. They think they fight for democracy and human rights. It never occurs to them that they are tools – disposable tools – replaceable pawns – biodegradable pieces on “The Grand Chessboard” of the Brzezińskis of this world.

*Moskal (москаль) (literally: inhabitant of Moscow and the region) is an ethnic slur for a Russian.

Alice Weidel – Sahra Wagenknecht

A few days ago Die Welt held a TV duel between Alice Weidel, one of the leaders of the Alternative fur Deutschland, and Sahra Wagenknecht from her own political movement: Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht. All Germany is said to have been excited about the event and commented on it afterwards. The moderator – i.e. “a person whose job is to make sure that a discussion or a debate is fair” (an Oxford dictionary definition of the meaning of the word) – did his best to make the debate hard to follow and unpleasant to listen to with all his frequent interruptions and an evident bias against Alice Weidel. But then nothing new under the sun: such debates are held not to help the viewers to form an opinion, but to convince them who is the bad and who is the good guy. But we digress.

There were five topics: 1) Israel, 2) Ukraine, 3) economy, 4) the United States, and 5) immigration. We are not going to cover all the topics nor evaluate which of the women appeared better: all this has been discussed by many media outlets, and the consumers of those media will mostly adopt the evaluation offered to them by the journalists rather than rely on their own senses, but then there you have it.

What we are going to do here is to say a few words about the topic of immigration or rather about what was not said during the duel. Alice Weidel represented that political movement that would like to reduce, stop or even reverse immigration, while Sahra Wagenknecht, although speaking also in favour of reducing or controlling the influx of settlers, was more reserved and – typically for any leftist politician – defended the “rights of the poor people.” What the two women said about immigration was nothing new, as already mentioned. Yet, one invariably wonders why the party that is against uncontrolled immigration or against immigration at all does not roll out the simplest arguments to support their political stance. These are the following:

① A nation – in this case Germans – has the right not to want to see strangers in their own country, just as an individual or a family has the right to have his home for himself, for his family.

② “New” Germans are false Germans or are Germany’s fair-weather friends (if they are friends at all, which in many cases is evidently not true): they have left their own nations in need and have adopted a new national identity only because of material gains. That means that once Germany finds itself in serious trouble they are going to leave for a country with “fair weather.”

③ The argument that Germany needs skilled workers and educated people (we disregard the fact that it is mostly unsklilled and uneducated people that arrive) is another term for exploitation of other nations, of other countries; rather than colonizing a Third World country and despoiling it of its material resources, Germany is going to despoil Third World countries of their best human resources (assuming still that it is the skilled and the educated that immigrate to Germany), thus making it hard or impossible for those countries to ever elevate themselves economically, which is going to generate new waves of “poor” people who will decide to leave for Europe.

④ No political party raises the demographic problem: why not encourage native Germans to have children and thus provide labour for the economy (again assuming that it is labour that the importers of humans are after)?

⑤ The idea that a tiny country like Germany can save the world from poverty and war and exploitation by accommodating even a few million people is ridiculous at best and downright foolish at worst; Africa’s population is booming and exceeding a billion while the economic and political problems are multiplying: there will never be an end to wars or economic crises. Besides, an attempt to save the global population (billions of people) by a tiny Germany (or other European country) is as absurd as the idea of saving the planet in that the same tiny Germany shuts down its power houses operating on coal or uranium.

⑥ We cannot talk about a German nation the moment there are millions of Poles, Turks, Serbs, Croats, Afghans, and members of the many Africans tribes; we cannot talk about German culture or heritage the moment there is a myriad of faiths and creeds, a myriad of cultural codes inside the country, apparently mixed as if in a cauldron, actually living in parallel worlds.

⑦ If Germany feels threatened by Russia (or any other state for that matter) as it is often said, then it needs a patriotic, cohesive society. Is there anyone so gullible as to think that a Nigerian or an Afghan is going to fight for Germany? Is that the reason why this Nigerian or that Afghan has left his own country in need and settled in an affluent Germany? Have all those Turks and Poles and Croats and, and, and come to Germany to fight for it and risk their lives?

⑧ No one dares to point to mental or – if you will – psychological differences between the human biological types, differences that are congenital. Congenital differences cannot be changed, and as such they will always cause unsolvable societal tensions that will erupt in deep divisions and – ultimately – civil war.

These are valid arguments against immigration.