Migration can change the democratic balance of power in a state or country for centuries. Like the butterfly effect in physics, where small initial changes can result in large differences at a later stage, a relatively small group of migrants now can change the distribution of political power in the future because there is a relation between ethnicity or religion and political choice. Ethnic or religious preferences in migration policies are unconstitutional. However, a population would lose its democratic right to determine its ethnic, religious and political future if it is forced to accept every migrant regardless of his origin.

We previously covered the impact of Ronald Reagan’s Amnesty Act of 1986, resulting in the shift of California’s population to Hispanic majority and consequentially making the state a bulwark of the Democratic Party, the Republicans’ rival.

We now wonder if the DACA deal, envisaging a path to citizenship for illegal minors currently present in the United States, could have a similar effect on Texas (the state with the second largest Latino population after California), so much so because the DACA has been enlarged from 800,000 individuals to 1.8 million. Continue reading →

an East German report

In the centre of our town, nearby the main railways station, you can see 15 men from North Africa who are selling there illegal drugs. Once a month there erupt fights with knives. Last December two young Germans were assaulted and wounded. The attackers ran away…

What do the Germans do? They look the other way. A year ago I myself was accosted by North Africans in the vicinity of the same railway station who asked if I wanted to buy drugs. I decided to pay no attention, but they did not feel discouraged and chased me with their rude language for a while.

As I saw two policemen close by, I made up my mind to inform them of what had happened. The officers only smiled and told me that those North Africans were known to be occupying that part of the town and selling dope. That was no secret. Yet, the officers’ orders were not to intervene. Their commander told them so. That, too, was no secret. The police can only intervene in case of aggravated assault. And even then the officers would have trouble explaining why of all the places they threaded their way to the drug market… Continue reading →

With his investments, Soros has become a billionaire. Unfortunately, for many years he has been interfering in the political and demographic developments in Europe and has been financially promoting ethnic replacement. Now he is turning against CSU, Facebook and Twitter because they are endangering his leftist revolution.

Like every year, Soros gave his speech on the state of the world at the World Economic Forum in Davos (see movie).The neo-liberal quasi self-made sage spoke to his heart’s content, while the open, freedom-loving society he invited soaked in each of his words like a sponge. Now hardly anyone noticed that Soros was trying to take away their freedoms.

In the beginning Soros spoke about Russia, which he describes as a mafia state, which adopted nationalist ideology and then he said that the US under Trump’s presidency will become similar in this respect. He now also included Hungary in the axis of evil. It is nothing new because he has always been hostile towards governments that are trying to protect their citizens from the consequences of open borders policies and the idea of an open society. What was new was that he scourged social networks. Soros maintains that since they have grown into powerful monopolies, they influence our behaviour and consciousness (especially during election time) too much. Continue reading →

The French ruling class has made ignorance the cornerstone of their policy as they are repressing the dawning awareness that the influx of people is changing their nation. Forever. The society is undergoing a profound demographic transformation it has not witnessed the likes of which since 500 AD and still the government does not keep track of the ethnicity and religion of its inhabitants. Instead, the French establishment propagates the “We are all French” mantra, repeating a strategy that failed during colonialism.

History teaches us that nations change profoundly when Islam becomes an important force. Still, the French elites believe that this law will miraculously not hold good for France. After the colonial period, they saw the French culture disappearing in South East Asia and Africa; now the same is going to happen in their own country. Muslims will not be a majority for many years to come yet, but soon, within one or two decades, they will become one of the most influential political forces. Continue reading →

In 2015, the European Central Bank began printing money. Since then, its balance sheet total has risen to 4.4 trillion euros (5.3 trillion dollars). It is the highest balance sheet total of all the world’s central banks. By comparison: the balance sheet total of the FED amounts to 4.4 trillion dollars, that of the Bank of Japan – 4.6.

Within the last 2.5 years, the ECB bought bonds for the incredible 2.5 billion euros, including government bonds of the excessively indebted PIGS countries. The Italian 10-year government bonds currently have a yield of 2%, the Spanish 1.5%. If the ECB hadn’t bought these bonds en masse, the yields would have had to be much higher and the countries would be insolvent. The ECB is therefore demotivating the countries of southern Europe when it comes to saving; it is spoiling them with the printed euro and does not compel them to reduce their debt. Under Mario Draghi, at peak times, the ECB printed 80 billion euros per month. At present, the sum has been limited to 30 billion euros. However, Draghi’s term of office ends in autumn 2019 and his successor will most likely be Jens Weidmann, whose candidacy is supported by Merkel and Schäuble. The southern European countries are resisting this, because Weidmann is known for his tougher course: if he is elected, he will probably switch off the printing press in Frankfurt am Main altogether. Continue reading →

What is the most common trait among the World Economic Forum attendees? They are educated, rich, even hard-working, but at the same time, they are consummate hypocrites.

We counted at least 8 panels during the five days in the Swiss mountains dedicated to climate change, environmental and energy issues; possibly the most debated topic among them all. One of the first panels in the opening day was indeed devoted to “sustainable transportation”. You’d think that for someone so worried about the issue, the men and women of Davos would try to set a good example regarding pollution. Oh no, they flocked to Switzerland with thousands of heavy carbon-emitting private planes; and that’s just the beginning.

We then have Hollywood and other show-biz celebrities lecturing the common man on respect for others, especially women. After the Weinstein, Spacey, Seagal cases, if anything, it’s time to start debating whether we should revoke the status of celebrities to actors. What is a celebrity after all? Someone that society celebrates for their skills. Ancient Romans and Greeks frowned upon actors. The term “hypocrite” indeed comes from ancient Greek, referring to “acting out” or “play-acting”; acting after all is deceiving the spectator into believing something that the actor in reality is not. Today’s Hollywood appears to fit that definition. While new movies seem to be overly eager to foist the empowerment of women, diversity and inclusion, behind the curtains prostitution and sexual abuses are rampant. There’s no reason to elevate hypocrites to the status of moral examples for society to follow. Continue reading →